Answer: Balance the Chemical Equation
Saturday, 16 of February , 2008 at 11:05 am
Question: Balance the chemical equation using Linear Algebra.
Answer: In order to balance the chemical equations, we need to find the five unknowns (ab,c,d,e).
Since the number of chemical elements are conserved, we know that:


we need to solve the following linear system.
This system of equations can easily be solved with Maple.
> with(Student[LinearAlgebra]):
> A := Matrix([[1, 1, 0, -1, 0, 0],
[1, 2, 0, 0, -1, 0],
[0, 0, 2, -4, -2, 0]]):
> ReducedRowEchelonForm(A)
According to maple, we can reduce the linear system to:
According to the above equation, we don’t have a unique solution. However, we know that the linear system will have a solution
where


Since we know that
(where
), we can add additional constraints to our linear system. If we look at the above equations, it is easy to see that the following constraint must hold:
Using the linear system and the above constraint, we find the following solutions…







…
…
As you can see, there is still an infinite amount of solutions for this chemical equations. Some can be reduced, however majority of the equations can’t be reduced
Question: Balance the chemical equation using Linear Algebra.

Answer: In order to balance the chemical equations, we need to find the five unknowns (ab,c,d,e).

Since the number of chemical elements are conserved, we know that:



we need to solve the following linear system.

This system of equations can easily be solved with Maple.
> with(Student[LinearAlgebra]): > A := Matrix([[1, 1, 0, -1, 0, 0], [1, 2, 0, 0, -1, 0], [0, 0, 2, -4, -2, 0]]): > ReducedRowEchelonForm(A)
According to maple, we can reduce the linear system to:

According to the above equation, we don’t have a unique solution. However, we know that the linear system will have a solution
where



Since we know that
(where
), we can add additional constraints to our linear system. If we look at the above equations, it is easy to see that the following constraint must hold:

Using the linear system and the above constraint, we find the following solutions…







…
…
As you can see, there is still an infinite amount of solutions for this chemical equations. Some can be reduced, however majority of the equations can’t be reduced
Leave a comment
Category: Answers, Linear Algebra






a
where
given
and 
)
) where
.
, we need to show:
where
where 
.






, we have shown if
where
where
.






, we have shown if 







because 


because 

because 




. If we use Ohm’s law, we can also determine the voltage difference between the points D and B to be
.
has even values for all
).
is even. This can easily be done:
is even than
is also even.



has to be even because
.
is even for all
because:
is even.
on a set
has a left unit and satisfies the identity
. Prove that
. Since the identity
and since
because of the definition of a left unit, therefore
.
, which will mean
and therefore 
. This means that
. Therefore, we know from the definition of a left unit that
.
is commutative.
, we can rename the variables while maintaining the validity of the identity.
. 